Stop Using AI to Recruit Faster. Start Using It to Recruit Better.
Learn how AI can revolutionize recruiting by shifting the focus from speed to quality, uncovering smarter strategies, deeper insights, and more effective hiring practices.
Learn how AI can revolutionize recruiting by shifting the focus from speed to quality, uncovering smarter strategies, deeper insights, and more effective hiring practices.
5 min read
Jenn Vu
When recruiters talk about AI, the conversation almost always turns to speed.
It comes up quickly and it sounds reasonable. AI helps us move faster. It helps us
screen more resumes, message more people, and manage more roles at once.
Recruiting is busy, so speed feels like the obvious win.
The problem is that this way of thinking puts us on the wrong path from the start.
The real value of AI in recruiting is not speed. It is quality. And when speed
becomes the main focus, AI often ends up being misapplied in ways that fail to
improve recruiting quality.
Most people would never say this directly, but the assumption is there. If AI can
move faster than I can, maybe I do not need to be as involved. Let AI screen the
resumes. Let AI rank the candidates. Let AI decide who is good.
That sounds efficient, but recruiting does not work that way.
When you optimize for speed, you are really optimizing for volume. You are
pushing more candidates through the same process without asking whether the
process itself is producing better outcomes. Faster decisions are not better
decisions if the inputs and assumptions are wrong. They are just harder to catch
because everything is moving too quickly.
If you take a step back, AI does not magically replace judgment. It does not
understand your hiring manager, your role, or your constraints unless you explain
them.
What it does do very well is help you see patterns you would never have time to
see on your own.
That is where quality comes from.
Instead of asking whether AI can help you screen ten thousand resumes, the
better question is what those ten thousand resumes have in common. Where did
they come from? Why do they look similar? What does that say about how you
are sourcing and filtering candidates?
AI can surface those patterns quickly and clearly, and those insights matter far
more than moving faster.
AI can help you see where your recruiting process is breaking down. It can
highlight where your sourcing is too narrow, where your filters are excluding strong candidates, and where your assumptions are no longer holding up.
Those are problems recruiters rarely have time to diagnose on their own. That is
why quality improves when AI is used to understand the system, not just move
candidates through it.
Quality is not about doing the same thing faster. It is about figuring out what is not
working and fixing it.
One of the most common uses of AI in recruiting today is resume ranking.
Recruiters hand over a stack of profiles and ask which ones are the best.
This often gets framed as innovation, but in reality it is just delegation.
If your criteria are flawed, AI will scale those flaws. If your sourcing is narrow, AI will reinforce it. If your definition of a strong candidate is outdated or incomplete, AI will not fix it. It will simply apply it more consistently.
Resume screening is not where quality is created. Quality comes from
understanding why the resumes look the way they do in the first place.
This is where many recruiters struggle, and it has nothing to do with technology.
People are short with AI.
They give it very little context and expect very good answers.
A common example is telling AI to “exclude San Francisco” without explaining why. Is it a compensation issue? A time zone constraint? A previous hiring miss? AI has no way of knowing.
When recruiters give vague instructions like exclude this location, find better
candidates, or rank these profiles without context, they are asking AI to guess at
decisions they themselves have not fully articulated.
Then they are surprised when the output feels generic or wrong.
AI cannot read your mind. It does not know why a location was excluded, why
certain candidates worked in the past, or why this role is different from the last
one unless you tell it. Quality requires context, and context requires effort.
There is a big difference between asking AI to do work and asking AI to help you
think.
Most recruiting prompts today are task-based. Summarize this resume. Write this
message. Rank these profiles. Those tasks can save time, but they do not improve
how you recruit.
The real value shows up when recruiters ask better questions. Are we looking in
the right places? Are our filters too restrictive? What patterns show up across the
candidates we keep rejecting? What assumptions are baked into our process that
may not actually be true?
Those questions force recruiters to examine their own decisions. AI stops being a
shortcut and starts acting like a sounding board.
When recruiters feel overwhelmed, the instinct is almost always to move faster.
But overwhelm is rarely caused by a lack of speed. It is usually caused by a lack of
clarity.
Too many candidates often means sourcing is unfocused. Too many resumes
usually means filters are blunt. Too many interviews often point to unclear criteria.
AI cannot fix those problems by accelerating the process. It fixes them by helping
you understand why they exist.
Where did these candidates come from? Why do they all look similar? Why do
none of them quite fit? Those are strategic questions, and AI can help answer
them if you let it.
One of the biggest mistakes recruiters make is treating AI like a search engine.
Search is transactional. You ask a question, get an answer, and move on. AI works
better as a conversation. The more you explain how you are thinking, not just what
you want, the better the results become.
That includes sharing uncertainty and frustration. It might feel odd at first, but it
works. When you stop treating AI like a vending machine and start treating it like a
collaborator, the quality of insight improves quickly.
If there is one practical takeaway from all of this, it is that recruiters need to be
better communicators.
Not just with candidates and hiring managers, but with AI itself.
Explain how you are thinking. Explain what has not worked before. Explain what
you are unsure about. When you do that, AI stops being a shortcut and starts
becoming a tool that actually makes you better at your job.
AI is not here to replace recruiters, but it will expose weak recruiting.
Shallow processes, unfocused sourcing, and outdated criteria become more
obvious when AI is layered on top. Used well, AI does not make recruiters faster. It
makes them sharper.
The shift recruiters need to make is not technical. It is a mindset change. Stop
asking how AI can do this for you and start asking how AI can help you do it better.
Speed is tempting. Quality is where the value is. And when AI is used with that goal in mind, it becomes one of the most useful tools recruiting has ever had.